Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Waste Management & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Astrup, T.
Right arrow Articles by Fruergaard, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Astrup, T.
Right arrow Articles by Fruergaard, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Incineration and co-combustion of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions

Thomas Astrup*, Jacob Møller, and Thilde Fruergaard

Technical University of Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tha{at}env.dtu.dk.


   Abstract

Important greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to waste incineration and co-combustion of waste were identified and considered relative to critical aspects such as: the contents of biogenic and fossil carbon, N2O emissions, fuel and material consumptions at the plants, energy recovery, and solid residues generated. GHG contributions were categorized with respect to direct emissions from the combustion plant as well as indirect upstream contributions (e.g. provision of fuels and materials) and indirect downstream contributions (e.g. substitution of electricity and heat produced elsewhere). GHG accounting was done per tonne of waste received at the plant. The content of fossil carbon in the input waste, for example as plastic, was found to be critical for the overall level of the GHG emissions, but also the energy conversion efficiencies were essential. The emission factors for electricity provision (also substituted electricity) affected the indirect downstream emissions with a factor of 3–9 depending on the type of electricity generation assumed. Provision of auxiliary fuels, materials and resources corresponded to up to 40% of the direct emission from the plants (which were 347–371 kg CO2-eq. tonne–1 of waste for incineration and 735–803 kg CO2-eq. tonne–1 of waste for co-combustion). Indirect downstream savings were within the range of –480 to –1373 kg CO2-eq. tonne–1 of waste for incineration and within –181 to –2607 kg CO2-eq. tonne–1 of waste for co-combustion. N2O emissions and residue management did not appear to play significant roles.

First published on September 11, 2009
Waste Management & Research 2009, doi:10.1177/0734242X09343774


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?