Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Waste Management & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0734242X09350333v1
27/9/871    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Møller, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Møller, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Global warming factors modelled for 40 generic municipal waste management scenarios

Thomas Højlund Christensen*, Federico Simion, Davide Tonini, and Jacob Møller

Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: thc{at}env.dtu.dk.


   Abstract

Global warming factors (kg CO2-eq.-tonne–1 of waste) have been modelled for 40 different municipal waste management scenarios involving a variety of recycling systems (paper, glass, plastic and organics) and residual waste management by landfilling, incineration or mechanical–biological waste treatment. For average European waste composition most waste management scenarios provided negative global warming factors and hence overall savings in greenhouse gas emissions: Scenarios with landfilling saved 0–400, scenarios with incineration saved 200–700, and scenarios with mechanical-biological treatment saved 200–750 kg CO2-eq. tonne–1 municipal waste depending on recycling scheme and energy recovery. Key parameters were the amount of paper recycled (it was assumed that wood made excessive by paper recycling substituted for fossil fuel), the crediting of the waste management system for the amount of energy recovered (hard-coal-based energy was substituted), and binding of biogenic carbon in landfills. Most other processes were of less importance. Rational waste management can provide significant savings in society's emission of greenhouse gas depending on waste composition and efficient utilization of the energy recovered.

First published on October 16, 2009, doi:10.1177/0734242X09350333

Waste Management & Research 2009;27:871.

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?