Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Waste Management & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0734242X09350485v1
27/9/839    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bahor, B.
Right arrow Articles by Blue, K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bahor, B.
Right arrow Articles by Blue, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Integrated waste management as a climate change stabilization wedge

Brian Bahor1*, Mike Van Brunt1, Jeff Stovall2, and Katherine Blue3

1 Covanta Energy
2 Williams E&P
3 Trinity Consultants

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Bbahor{at}covantaenergy.com.


   Abstract

Anthropogenic sources of greenhouse gas emissions are known to contribute to global increases in greenhouse gas concentrations and are widely believed to contribute to climate change. A reference carbon dioxide concentration of 383 ppm for 2007 is projected to increase to a nominal 500 ppm in less than 50 years according to business as usual models. This concentration change is equivalent to an increase of 7 billion tonnes of carbon per year (7 Gt C year–1). The concept of a stabilization wedge was introduced by Pacala and Socolow (Science, 305, 968–972, 2004) to break the 7 Gt C year–1 into more manageable 1 Gt C year–1 reductions that would be achievable with current technology. A total of fifteen possible 'wedges' were identified; however, an integrated municipal solid waste (MSW) management system based on the European Union's waste management hierarchy was not evaluated as a wedge. This analysis demonstrates that if the tonnage of MSW is allocated to recycling, waste to energy and landfilling in descending order in lieu of existing 'business-as-usual' practices with each option using modern technology and best practices, the system would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by more than 1 Gt C year–1. This integrated waste management system reduces CO2 by displacing fossil electrical generation and avoiding manufacturing energy consumption and methane emissions from landfills.

First published on October 6, 2009, doi:10.1177/0734242X09350485

Waste Management & Research 2009;27:839.

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?