Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Waste Management & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0734242X09350659v1
27/9/850    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gentil, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, T. H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gentil, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, T. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Global Warming Factor of MSW Management in Europe

Emmanuel Christophe Gentil, Julie Clavreul, and Thomas Højlund Christensen*

Technical University of Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: thc{at}env.dtu.dk.


  Abstract

The global warming factor (GWF; CO2-eq. tonne–1 waste) performance of municipal waste management has been investigated for six representative European Member States: Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Poland and the United Kingdom. The study integrated European waste statistical data for 2007 in a life-cycle assessment modelling perspective. It is shown that significant GWF benefit was achieved due to the high level of energy and material recovery substituting fossil energy and raw materials production, especially in Denmark and Germany. The study showed that, despite strong regulation of waste management at European level, there are major differences in GWF performance among the member states, due to the relative differences of waste composition, type of waste management technologies available nationally, and the average performance of these technologies. It has been demonstrated through a number of sensitivity analyses that, within the national framework, key waste management technology parameters can influence drastically the national GWF performance of waste management.

First published on October 6, 2009, doi:10.1177/0734242X09350659

Waste Management & Research 2009;27:850.

A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2009

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?