Waste Management & Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lydholm, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lydholm, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Waste Management & Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, 237-247 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X8300100128

Fate of Coxsackievirus B3 During Aerobic and Anaerobic Sludge Stabilization{ddagger}

Anne L. Nielsen

The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University of Copenhagen, Department of Veterinary Virology and Immunology, 13, Bülowsvej, 1870 Copenhagen V, Denmark.

Birgit Lydholm

The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University of Copenhagen, Department of Veterinary Virology and Immunology, 13, Bülowsvej, 1870 Copenhagen V, Denmark.

The survival of viruses has been measured in bench scale stabilization units. A strain of coxsackievirus B3 was seeded in sludge and recoveries were measured at intervals from 1 h to 70 days. Mesophilic anaerobic digesters were operated at 33°C with detention times of 15 and 33 days. Thermophilic digesters were operated at 50, 53 and 56°C with detention times of 4 to 10 days. Aerobic stabilization was carried out at 5, 20 and 33"C (with detention times of 30, 20 and 15 days, respectively.

Controls were run at the same temperature in Hanks' balanced salt solution.

Inactivation of virus was slower in thermophilic anaerobic digesters than in the controls and the rate of inactivation often fell off with time (tailing). In mesophilic anaerobic digesters and aerobic stabilization units, the rates of inactivation were greater than in the controls.

The rates are, nevertheless, very much faster at the higher temperatures. Up to 3 log units of destruction might be obtained if the interval between feeding and drawing at 53°C were 10 h and 5 log units if it were 24 h. Retention times would have to be serveral days at 33°C to obtain similar reduction in virus content.

Key Words: Virus • sludge • aerobic stabilization • anaerobic digestion • thermophilic digestion • coxsackievirus B3.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?