Waste Management & Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanskanen, J.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Melanen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tanskanen, J.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Melanen, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Waste Management & Research, Vol. 17, No. 2, 80-92 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X9901700204

Modelling separation strategies of municipal solid waste in Finland

Juha-Heikki Tanskanen

Finnish Environment Institute, PB 140, FIN-00251 Helsinki, Finland

Matti Melanen

Finnish Environment Institute, PB 140, FIN-00251 Helsinki, Finland

The first Finnish National Waste Plan follows the waste policy of the European Union by setting high recovery rate targets, i.e., 50%wt by the end of 2000 and 70%wt by 2005, for municipal solid waste management (MSWM). A computer model, TASAR (Tool for Analysing Separation Actions and Recovery), was developed to study recovery levels reached by different separation strategies in Finland. The model includes a special method which was developed for the analysis of interdependence between the on-site obligation limits and the coverage of on-site collection systems. In the study TASAR proved to be a useful tool in calculating the recovery rates attained with various separation strategies. The recovery rate targets set in the National Waste Plan cannot be reached by source separation alone. This conclusion holds true regardless of the source separation strategy used. Even when the source separation activity of waste producers was increased by 15 to 30% the 70%wt target required an all-inclusive on site collection for all recoverable waste components and all waste producers. Consequently, central separation of mixed waste must be added to the MSWM strategies pursued in order to improve the efficiency of source separation.

Key Words: Collection • Finland • model • municipal solid waste • recovery rate • separation • strategy • waste stream


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Waste Manag ResHome page
H. Dahlbo, S. Koskela, J. Laukka, T. Myllymaa, T. Jouttijarvi, M. Melanen, and J. Tenhunen
Life cycle inventory analyses for five waste management options for discarded newspaper
Waste Management Research, August 1, 2005; 23(4): 291 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]