This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Davidsson, A. Articles by Hallmer, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Davidsson, A. Articles by Hallmer, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Anaerobic digestion potential of urban organic waste: a case study in Malmö

Water and Environmental Engineering, Dept of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Sweden, asa.davidsson{at}vateknik.lth.se

Jes la Cour Jansen

Water and Environmental Engineering, Dept of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Sweden

Björn Appelqvist

City of Malmö, VA-verket, Malmö, Sweden

Christopher Gruvberger

City of Malmö, VA-verket, Malmö, Sweden

Martin Hallmer

South Scania Waste Company (SYSAV), Malmö, Sweden

A study of existing organic waste types in Malmö, Sweden was performed. The purpose was to gather information about organic waste types in the city to be able to estimate the potential for anaerobic treatment in existing digesters at the wastewater treatment plan (WWTP). The urban organic waste types that could have a significant potential for anaerobic digestion amount to about 50 000 tonnes year^-1 (sludge excluded). Some of the waste types were further evaluated by methane potential tests and continuous pilot-scale digestion. Single-substrate digestion and co-digestion of pre-treated, source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste, waste-water sludge, sludge from grease traps and fruit and vegetable waste were carried out. The experiments showed that co-digestion of grease sludge and WWTP sludge was a better way of making use of the methane potential in the grease trap sludge than single-substrate digestion. Another way of increasing the methane production in sludge digesters is to add source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste (SSOFMSW). Adding SSOFMSW (20% of the total volatile solids) gave a 10-15% higher yield than could be expected by comparison with separate digestion of sludge respective SSOFMSW. Co-digestion of sludge and organic waste is beneficial not just for increasing gas production but also for stabilizing the digestion process. This was seen when co-digesting fruit and vegetable waste and sludge. When co-digested with sludge, this waste gave a better result than the separate digestion of fruit and vegetable waste. Considering single-substrate digestion, SSOFMSW is the only waste in the study which makes up a sufficient quantity to be suitable as the base substrate in a full-scale digester that is separated from the sludge digestion. The two types of SSOFMSW tested in the pilot-scale digestion were operated successfully at mesophilic temperature. By adding SSOFMSW, grease trap sludge and fruit and vegetables waste to sludge digesters at the wastewater treatment plant, the yearly energy production from methane could be expected to increase from 24 to 43 GWh.

Key Words: Biogas • organic waste • methane • anaerobic digestion • potential • wmr 1032-6

Waste Management & Research, Vol. 25, No. 2, 162-169 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X07075635


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?