This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Luoranen, M. Articles by Horttanainen, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Luoranen, M. Articles by Horttanainen, M. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Feasibility of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in an integrated municipal energy supply and waste management system

Department of Energy and Environmental Technology, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland, Mika.Luoranen{at}lut.fi

Mika Horttanainen

Department of Energy and Environmental Technology, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland

A decision-support model for determining the feasibility of a planned energy-from-waste (EfW) investment for an integrated waste management and energy supply system is presented. The aim is to present an easy-to-understand, inexpensive and fast-to-use tool to decision-makers for modelling and evaluating different kinds of processes. Special emphasis is put on forming the model and interpretation of the results of the example case. The simple integrated system management (SISMan) model is presented through a practical example of the use of the model. In the example the viability of the described system is studied by comparing five different cases including different waste-derived fuels (WDF), non-segregated municipal solid waste (MSW) being one of the fuel options. The nominal power output of the EfW plant varied in each case according to the WDF classification. The numeric values for two main variables for each WDF type were determined, the WDF price at the gate of the EfW plant and the waste management fee (WMF) according to the `polluter pays' -principle. Comparison between the five cases was carried out according to two determinants, the WMF related to each case and the recovery rate related to each case. The numeric values for the constants and variables used in the calculations were chosen as realistically as possible using available data related to the issue. In the example of this paper, the mass-incineration solution (`pure' MSW as a fuel) was found to be the most viable solution for the described system according to the calculations. However, the final decision of the decision-makers might differ from this in the real world due to extra `fuzzy' information that cannot be reliably included in the calculations. This paper shows that certain key values of modelled systems can be calculated using an easy-to-use tool at the very early stages of a larger design process involving municipal and business partners. The use of this kind of tools could significantly decrease the overall design costs of large systems in the long run by cutting out irrational system options at the very beginning of the planning.

Key Words: Waste management systems • energy supply systems • waste to energy • energy from waste • decision-support model • wmr 998—5

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Ragossnig, C. Wartha, and A. Kirchner Energy efficiency in waste-to-energy and its relevance with regard to climate control. Waste Management Research, February 1, 2008; 26(1): 70 - 77. [Abstract] [PDF]