This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Donnini Mancini, S. Articles by de Mattos, T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Donnini Mancini, S. Articles by de Mattos, T. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Recycling potential of urban solid waste destined for sanitary landfills: the case of Indaiatuba, SP, Brazil

Environmental Engineering, Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil, mancini{at}sorocaba.unesp.br

Alex Rodrigues Nogueira

Environmental Engineering, Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil

Dennis Akira Kagohara

Environmental Engineering, Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil

Jonas Age Saide Schwartzman

Environmental Engineering, Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil

Tânia de Mattos

Environmental Engineering, Universidade Estadual Paulista-UNESP, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil

The urban solid waste of the city of Indaiatuba (pop. 175 000), located in the state of São Paulo, was characterized, focusing on the recycling potential. For this purpose, collected waste was subdivided into 27 items, classified by mass and volume. About 90% of this waste was found to be potentially recyclable and only 10% requiring landfilling. The compostable organic matter, in the form of food and garden waste, both with high moisture content (51 and 41%, respectively), represents 54% in mass and 21% in volume. The most common type of plastic in this waste is high density polyethylene, whose estimated disposal is about 5000 kg day^—1. A socio-economic analysis of the waste generation indicates that low-income neighbourhoods discard relatively less packaging and more food waste, shoes and construction debris than middle and high income ones, which may be due to low purchasing power and schooling. Our findings indicate that more aluminium and uncoloured polyethylene terephthalate is discarded in the warmest months of the year, probably due to a greater consumption of canned and bottled drinks.

Key Words: Waste composition • food waste • recycling • municipal solid waste • wmr 997—8

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?