Waste Management & Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rabl, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zoughaib, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Waste Management & Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, 147-162 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X07080755
© 2008 International Solid Waste Association

Environmental impacts and costs of solid waste: a comparison of landfill and incineration

Ari Rabl

Ecole des Mines, 60 boul. St.-Michel, 75272 Paris 06, France, ari.rabl{at}gmail.com

Joseph V. Spadaro

Ecole des Mines, 60 boul. St.-Michel, 75272 Paris 06, France

Assaad Zoughaib

Ecole des Mines, 60 boul. St.-Michel, 75272 Paris 06, France

The methodology for evaluating the impacts and damage costs (`external costs') due to pollution from waste treatment is described and the results are presented, based on the ExternE project series of the European Commission. The damage costs of landfill and incineration of municipal solid waste are compared, with due account for energy and materials recovery, as well as possible differences in transport distance. We have not been able to quantify the total damage costs of leachates because of the complexity of the environmental pathways and of the long time horizon of some persistent pollutants, but we consider an extreme scenario to show that they are not worth worrying about in the sense that reducing the pollutants in leachates beyond current regulations would bring negligible benefit in comparison with the abatement of other sources of the same pollutants. The damage costs due to the construction of the waste treatment facility are negligible. The damage costs of waste transport, which are illustrated by an arbitrary choice of a 100 km round trip by a 16 tonne truck, are also negligible. The benefits of materials recovery make a small contribution to the total damage cost. The only significant contributions come from direct emissions (of the landfill or incinerator) and from avoided emissions due to energy recovery (from an incinerator). Damage costs for incineration range from about 4 to 21 tonnewaste—1, and they are extremely dependent on the assumed scenario for energy recovery. For landfill the cost ranges from about 10 to 13 tonnewaste—1 ; it is dominated by greenhouse gas emissions because only a fraction of the CH4 can be captured (here assumed to be 70%). Amenity costs (odour, visual impact, noise) are highly site-specific and we only cite results from a literature survey which indicates that such costs could make a significant contribution, very roughly on the order of 1 tonnewaste —1.

Key Words: External costs • impact pathway analysis • life cycle assessment • air pollution • dioxins • toxic metals • health impacts • greenhouse gases • energy recovery • materials recovery • wmr 1068—3


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?