This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0734242X09350485v1 27/9/839    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bahor, B. Articles by Blue, K. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bahor, B. Articles by Blue, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Integrated waste management as a climate change stabilization wedge

Covanta Energy Corporation, Fairfield, New Jersey, USA, bbahor{at}covantaenergy.com

Michael Van Brunt

Covanta Energy Corporation, Fairfield, New Jersey, USA

Jeff Stovall

Williams E&P, Fort Worth, Texas, USA

Katherine Blue

Trinity Consultants, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Anthropogenic sources of greenhouse gas emissions are known to contribute to global increases in greenhouse gas concentrations and are widely believed to contribute to climate change. A reference carbon dioxide concentration of 383 ppm for 2007 is projected to increase to a nominal 500 ppm in less than 50 years according to business as usual models. This concentration change is equivalent to an increase of 7 billion tonnes of carbon per year (7 Gt C year^—1). The concept of a stabilization wedge was introduced by Pacala and Socolow (Science, 305, 968—972, 2004) to break the 7 Gt C year^{— 1} into more manageable 1 Gt C year^{— 1} reductions that would be achievable with current technology. A total of fifteen possible ‘wedges’ were identified; however, an integrated municipal solid waste (MSW) management system based on the European Union’s waste management hierarchy was not evaluated as a wedge. This analysis demonstrates that if the tonnage of MSW is allocated to recycling, waste to energy and landfilling in descending order in lieu of existing ‘business-as-usual’ practices with each option using modern technology and best practices, the system would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by more than 1 Gt C year ^—1. This integrated waste management system reduces CO₂ by displacing fossil electrical generation and avoiding manufacturing energy consumption and methane emissions from landfills.

Key Words: Climate stabilization wedge • waste to energy • waste management • recycling • greenhouse gas

This version was published on November 1, 2009

Waste Management & Research, Vol. 27, No. 9, 839-849 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X09350485


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?