Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Waste Management & Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, H. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Performance of Electrostatic Precipitators

H. Høgh Petersen

F. L. Smidth & Co., 77 Vigersler Allé, DK-2500, Copenhagen, Denmark

The large majority of municipal refuse incinerators utilize electrostatic precipitators for control of particulate emission. Precipitator performance is determined by the detailed chemical and physical properties of the fly ash and the gas in which it is suspended. Variations in the composition of the refuse burnt, of seasonal or other nature, as well as variations in the operation of the incinerator installation have a pronounced effect on precipitator exit emissions. Large temporal variations in the particulate emissions, not related to normally registered variations in refuse composition and plant operation, occur, as illustrated by measurements at a large Danish incinerator plant. Such variations, resulting from the variability of the process parameters, should be taken into account for the sizing and design of precipitators for new incinerator installations, and also when evaluating emission data from existing incinerator plants.

Key Words: Electrostatic precipitator • (ESP) • incinerator • variability • refuse • resistivity • operation • performance • Denmark.

Waste Management & Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, 23-33 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/0734242X8600400105


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?