This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0734242X09103823v1 27/4/399    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Zhao, Y. Articles by Christensen, T. H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhao, Y. Articles by Christensen, T. H Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Life cycle assessment of the municipal solid waste management system in Hangzhou, China (EASEWASTE)

¹ Tsinghua University
² Technology University of Denmark

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: htwang{at}mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.

	Abstract

With the purpose of assessing the environmental impacts and benefits of the current municipal solid waste management system and two modified systems, EASEWASTE, a life-cycle-based model, was used to evaluate the waste system of Hangzhou city in China. An integrated model was established, including waste generation, collection, transportation, treatment, disposal and accompanying external processes. The results showed that CH₄ released from landfilling was the primary pollutant contributing to global warming, and HCl and NH₃ from incineration contributed most to acidification. Material recycling and incineration with energy recovery were important because of the induced savings in material production based on virgin materials and in energy production based on coal combustion. A modified system in which waste is transported to the nearest incinerators would be relatively better than the current system, mainly due to the decrease of pollution from landfilled waste and the increase in energy production from waste avoiding energy production by traditional power plants. A ban on free plastic bags for shopping was shown to reduce most environmental impacts due to saved oil resources and other materials used in producing the plastic bags. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. LCA methodology and a model like EASEWASTE are very suitable for evaluating the overall environmental consequences, and can be used for decision support and strategic planning in developing countries such as China where pollution control has become increasingly important with the rapid increase of waste generation as well as the increasing public awareness of environmental protection.

First published on May 26, 2009, doi:10.1177/0734242X09103823

Waste Management & Research 2009;27:399.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?